Haiwen Secures US$60 Million Hong Kong High Court Judgment in Major Shareholder Loan Recovery
海問律師事務(wù)所欣然宣布，本所香港辦公室近日成功代表某國有商業(yè)銀行香港分行于香港高等法院相關(guān)訴訟中取得勝訴判決，獲判金額6,000萬美元，并取得判后利息及全額彌償基準之訴訟費用。
Haiwen & Partners is pleased to announce that its Hong Kong has successfully acted for the Hong Kong branch of a state-owned commercial bank in proceedings before the High Court of Hong Kong, resulting in judgment for US$60 million, together with interest and indemnity costs.
2026年1月，香港高等法院就一項結(jié)構(gòu)性融資安排項下、作為擔保轉(zhuǎn)讓之股東貸款作出判決，裁定客戶有權(quán)收回尚未償還的本金6,000萬美元。法院同時判令被告按判后利率支付利息直至全部清償，并命令被告按全額彌償基準承擔本案訴訟費用（包括相關(guān)申請的費用），有關(guān)費用已獲簡易評定。
In January 2026, the High Court entered judgment in favour of our clients for the outstanding principal of US$60 million arising from shareholder loan arrangements that had been assigned as security under a structured financing arrangement. The Court also awarded interest at the judgment rate until full payment and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the action, including the relevant application, on a full indemnity basis, with costs summarily assessed.
本案涉及在擔保融資框架下對已轉(zhuǎn)讓股東貸款的司法執(zhí)行。被告提出多項抗辯理由以抗辯其責任，包括主張存在限制債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的附帶口頭約定，以及質(zhì)疑公司授權(quán)的有效性。法院在聽取雙方陳詞并全面審閱相關(guān)證據(jù)后，駁回被告的抗辯主張，判決原告全面勝訴。
The proceedings concerned the enforcement of assigned shareholder loans within a secured financing framework. The defendant advanced various grounds seeking to resist liability, including allegations of an alleged collateral understanding restricting assignment and lack of corporate authority. After hearing submissions and considering the evidence, the Court rejected the defendant’s position and granted judgment in full.
該判決再次彰顯香港法院對依法訂立之擔保安排及債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓機制的堅定維護，以及在有充分當時公司文件及公開披露支持的情況下，對明確合同條款予以嚴格執(zhí)行的司法立場。
The decision underscores the Hong Kong Court’s firm approach in upholding properly documented security and assignment arrangements, and its readiness to give effect to clear contractual terms supported by contemporaneous corporate records and public disclosures.
本案由合伙人劉洋律師領(lǐng)銜，資深顧問吳華佳律師擔任主要經(jīng)辦律師；德輔大律師事務(wù)所許琪莉大律師及劉逸沖大律師出庭代理。
The matter was led by Edward Liu (Partner), with Lori Ng (Counsel) serving as the principal case handler. Cherry Xu and Charlie Liu of Des Voeux Chambers acted as Counsel for the hearing.
劉洋律師表示：“我們非常高興為客戶取得這一令人滿意的結(jié)果。本案判決再次印證香港法律制度在執(zhí)行商業(yè)融資及擔保安排方面的穩(wěn)健性與可靠性。”
Commenting on the outcome, Edward Liu said: “We are delighted to have secured this satisfactory result for our clients. The judgment reaffirms the strength and reliability of Hong Kong’s legal framework in enforcing commercial financing and security arrangements.”
海問律師事務(wù)所持續(xù)為金融機構(gòu)及企業(yè)客戶提供復雜、高價值爭議解決服務(wù)，在銀行與金融、擔保交易及跨境執(zhí)行領(lǐng)域擁有豐富經(jīng)驗與卓越實踐。
Haiwen continues to advise financial institutions and corporations on complex, high-value disputes, with particular experience in banking, secured transactions, and cross-border enforcement.
Haiwen Secures US$60 Million Hong Kong High Court Judgment in Major Shareholder Loan Recovery
海問律師事務(wù)所欣然宣布，本所香港辦公室近日成功代表某國有商業(yè)銀行香港分行于香港高等法院相關(guān)訴訟中取得勝訴判決，獲判金額6,000萬美元，并取得判后利息及全額彌償基準之訴訟費用。
Haiwen & Partners is pleased to announce that its Hong Kong has successfully acted for the Hong Kong branch of a state-owned commercial bank in proceedings before the High Court of Hong Kong, resulting in judgment for US$60 million, together with interest and indemnity costs.
2026年1月，香港高等法院就一項結(jié)構(gòu)性融資安排項下、作為擔保轉(zhuǎn)讓之股東貸款作出判決，裁定客戶有權(quán)收回尚未償還的本金6,000萬美元。法院同時判令被告按判后利率支付利息直至全部清償，并命令被告按全額彌償基準承擔本案訴訟費用（包括相關(guān)申請的費用），有關(guān)費用已獲簡易評定。
In January 2026, the High Court entered judgment in favour of our clients for the outstanding principal of US$60 million arising from shareholder loan arrangements that had been assigned as security under a structured financing arrangement. The Court also awarded interest at the judgment rate until full payment and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the action, including the relevant application, on a full indemnity basis, with costs summarily assessed.
本案涉及在擔保融資框架下對已轉(zhuǎn)讓股東貸款的司法執(zhí)行。被告提出多項抗辯理由以抗辯其責任，包括主張存在限制債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的附帶口頭約定，以及質(zhì)疑公司授權(quán)的有效性。法院在聽取雙方陳詞并全面審閱相關(guān)證據(jù)后，駁回被告的抗辯主張，判決原告全面勝訴。
The proceedings concerned the enforcement of assigned shareholder loans within a secured financing framework. The defendant advanced various grounds seeking to resist liability, including allegations of an alleged collateral understanding restricting assignment and lack of corporate authority. After hearing submissions and considering the evidence, the Court rejected the defendant’s position and granted judgment in full.
該判決再次彰顯香港法院對依法訂立之擔保安排及債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓機制的堅定維護，以及在有充分當時公司文件及公開披露支持的情況下，對明確合同條款予以嚴格執(zhí)行的司法立場。
The decision underscores the Hong Kong Court’s firm approach in upholding properly documented security and assignment arrangements, and its readiness to give effect to clear contractual terms supported by contemporaneous corporate records and public disclosures.
本案由合伙人劉洋律師領(lǐng)銜，資深顧問吳華佳律師擔任主要經(jīng)辦律師；德輔大律師事務(wù)所許琪莉大律師及劉逸沖大律師出庭代理。
The matter was led by Edward Liu (Partner), with Lori Ng (Counsel) serving as the principal case handler. Cherry Xu and Charlie Liu of Des Voeux Chambers acted as Counsel for the hearing.
劉洋律師表示：“我們非常高興為客戶取得這一令人滿意的結(jié)果。本案判決再次印證香港法律制度在執(zhí)行商業(yè)融資及擔保安排方面的穩(wěn)健性與可靠性。”
Commenting on the outcome, Edward Liu said: “We are delighted to have secured this satisfactory result for our clients. The judgment reaffirms the strength and reliability of Hong Kong’s legal framework in enforcing commercial financing and security arrangements.”
海問律師事務(wù)所持續(xù)為金融機構(gòu)及企業(yè)客戶提供復雜、高價值爭議解決服務(wù)，在銀行與金融、擔保交易及跨境執(zhí)行領(lǐng)域擁有豐富經(jīng)驗與卓越實踐。
Haiwen continues to advise financial institutions and corporations on complex, high-value disputes, with particular experience in banking, secured transactions, and cross-border enforcement.
京ICP備05019364號-1 
京公網(wǎng)安備110105011258
近日，北京市海問律師事務(wù)所（“本所”）發(fā)現(xiàn)，網(wǎng)絡(luò)上存在將一家名為“廣州海問睿律咨詢顧問有限公司”的主體與本所進行不當關(guān)聯(lián)的大量不實信息，導致社會公眾產(chǎn)生混淆與誤解，也對本所的聲譽及正常執(zhí)業(yè)活動造成不良影響。
本所特此澄清，本所與“廣州海問睿律咨詢顧問有限公司”（成立于2025年11月）不存在任何隸屬、投資、關(guān)聯(lián)、合作、授權(quán)或品牌許可關(guān)系，亦從未授權(quán)任何主體以“海問”的名義提供法律咨詢服務(wù)，該公司的任何行為與本所無關(guān)。更多詳情，請點擊左下方按鈕查看。
