
Summary
本期摘要
法規解讀:《最高人民法院關于審理勞動爭議案件適用法律問題的解釋(二)(征求意見稿)》發布,《刑法修正案(十二)》公布
Interpretation of Laws and Regulation: The Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases (II) (Exposure Draft) was released, and the Amendment to the Criminal Law (XII) was promulgated
法規解讀:上海市、海南省、重慶市以及安徽省陸續就非勞動關系人員參加工傷保險出臺新規定
Interpretation of Laws and Regulation: Shanghai, Hainan, Chongqing and Anhui Have Successively Published New Regulations on the Participation of Persons not in an Employment Relationship in Work-Related Injury Insurance
新規速遞:各地陸續出臺優化社會保險費繳費流程的公告
新規速遞:上海市人社局進一步規范勞務派遣用工
典型案例:最高院發布關于勞動合同糾紛的公報案例,陜西省、貴州省分別發布勞動人事爭議典型案例
典型案例:上海市三法院分別發布勞動爭議相關典型案例
Exploration of Typical Cases: Three Courts in Shanghai Released Labor Disputes Typical Cases
典型案例:北京市東城區人民法院發布兩批勞動用工相關典型案例
Exploration of Typical Cases: Beijing Dongcheng District People’s Court Released Two Batches of Typical Cases Related to Labor and Employment
1. 《最高人民法院關于審理勞動爭議案件適用法律問題的解釋(二)(征求意見稿)》發布
We have recently produced an article-by-article interpretation of the Exposure Draft from the perspective of relevant background as well as suggestions for improvement (for more information you may refer to the “Haiwen Observation: Interpretation and Suggestions for the Exposure Draft (I)” and “Haiwen Observation: Interpretation and Suggestions for the Exposure Draft (II)”).
2. 《刑法修正案(十二)》公布
二、法規解讀:上海市、海南省、重慶市以及安徽省陸續就非勞動關系人員參加工傷保險出臺新規定
Haiwen suggestion: Under atypical employment relationships and new work forms, the risk of work-related injury liability is one of the primary concerns for employers. To manage this risk, enterprises can, in accordance with policies, participate in work-related injury insurance for relevant personnel or contribute to supplementary work-related injury insurance. For those who have established labor relations with the enterprise, the enterprise shall still participate in social insurance in accordance with the law.
三、新規速遞:各地陸續出臺優化社會保險費繳費流程的公告

四、新規速遞:上海市人社局進一步規范勞務派遣用工
If the labor dispatch is converted into labor outsourcing services, the management of the workers towards workers under the original labor dispatch legal relationship shall be adjusted. The boundaries of management shall be reasonably determined in accordance with the nature of the labor outsourcing services, with reference to the principles of direct management and indirect management. Where an employer uses workers under the form of labor dispatch in the name of contracting or outsourcing, it shall be handled in accordance with the Interim Provisions on Labor Dispatch.
五、典型案例:最高院發布關于勞動合同糾紛的公報案例,陜西省、貴州省分別發布勞動人事爭議典型案例
Criteria for reviewing the legality of an employer’s termination of an employment contract due to employee fraud. In one case, the employee was a broadcasting teacher in an art training school, and provided false diploma and Elementary Teacher Certificate during the interview. The court held that the employee’s behavior caused the school to make a wrong manifestation of intention, which constituted fraud in the legal sense. In another case, the employee was a sales manager, and filled out the column of “Whether there is a dispute in a lawsuit case or a judgment” in the registration form in the “no”, but in fact the employee and the former employer did have a labor dispute. The court held that the concealment of the existence of a labor dispute lawsuit with his former employer was not linked to the fulfillment of the labor contract, and did not constitute fraud in the legal sense.
六、典型案例:上海市三法院分別發布勞動爭議相關典型案例
1. 上海市高級人民法院發布“穩定就業”相關的典型案例
2. 上海市徐匯區人民法院發布《涉民營企業勞動爭議案件審判白皮書》
On 15 December 2023, Shanghai Fengxian District People’s Court issued a White Paper on Labor Dispute Trial and Enforcement Cases. In Case V of the White Paper, the employee filed over a dozen arbitration and litigation cases in the past five years against different employers, and his requests usually included the difference of double wages for not sign a written labor contract. He had requested the handwriting verification of the signatures repeatedly in the labor contract for many times, and then obtained the identification conclusion that the signatures were not signed by the employee himself. The court taking into account the employee’s handwriting characteristics in the handwriting sample were not fully reflected, and thus accessed to the employee’s signature written in the transcripts of other trials for identification, and found that the employee’s signature in the labor contract was signed by himself. Thereafter the employee filed a new labor contract dispute and applied for handwriting verification again, Fengxian Court did not arrange the handwriting verification, but confirmed the authenticity of the labor contract, and did not support the employee’s claim for the difference of double wages based on the chat records between the legal representative and the employee about the expiration time of the labor contract.
七、典型案例:北京市東城區人民法院發布兩批勞動用工相關典型案例
1. 北京市東城區人民法院(“東城法院”)發布能動司法審理勞動爭議典型案例
2. 東城法院發布《雇主責任保險案件審判白皮書》
京ICP備05019364號-1
京公網安備110105011258
近日,北京市海問律師事務所(“本所”)發現,網絡上存在將一家名為“廣州海問睿律咨詢顧問有限公司”的主體與本所進行不當關聯的大量不實信息,導致社會公眾產生混淆與誤解,也對本所的聲譽及正常執業活動造成不良影響。
本所特此澄清,本所與“廣州海問睿律咨詢顧問有限公司”(成立于2025年11月)不存在任何隸屬、投資、關聯、合作、授權或品牌許可關系,亦從未授權任何主體以“海問”的名義提供法律咨詢服務,該公司的任何行為與本所無關。更多詳情,請點擊左下方按鈕查看。